![]() |
|
|||||||
High Definition Media A place to discuss BD, HD DVD and D-VHS and things that affect adoption of HD Media ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1651 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 15,372
|
Updated thru week ending 2/11/12
Table of Blu-ray sales (HMM and DEG) numbers are in (revenue) millions. Weekly figures are from HMM (Home Media Magazine Code:
2012 HMM 878.76 -2.7% 670.31 -9.3% 208.35 27.6% 23.7% 1024.5 810.0 Week Date OD OD YoY DVD DVD YoY BD BD YoY BD Share TBO2012 TBO2011 6 2/11 205.54 19.4% 151.09 3.1% 54.45 104.2% 26.5% 316.5 224.0 5 2/4 144.90 -8.6% 110.25 -16.0% 34.65 27.1% 23.9% 118.5 23.0 4 1/28 131.95 -13.6% 98.40 -20.2% 33.55 14.2% 25.4% 226.3 201.2 3 1/21 129.39 -2.4% 103.53 -4.9% 25.86 8.9% 20.0% 112.7 60.7 2 1/14 128.65 -5.1% 100.16 -7.7% 28.49 5.6% 22.1% 143.4 116.2 1 1/7 138.33 -8.0% 106.88 -11.6% 31.35 7.0% 22.7% 157.7 134.3 2011 DEG 8951.80 -13.2% 6851.80 -19.5% 2150.00 19.4% 24.0% 2011 HMM 8604.20 -13.9% 6608.28 -20.3% 1995.92 17.7% 23.2% 9936.0 10820.9 Q4 DEG 3338.95 -11.0% 2464.81 -16.5% 924.14 15.5% 27.7% Q4 HMM 3125.11 -12.4% 2280.75 -19.5% 844.36 15.1% 27.0% 3698.4 3932.2 52 12/31 174.13 -25.6% 130.29 -28.7% 43.84 -14.7% 25.2% 64.3 95.9 51 12/24 482.11 -13.1% 368.59 -16.9% 113.52 2.2% 23.5% 205.6 303.6 50 12/17 369.89 -23.4% 280.58 -26.8% 89.31 -10.1% 24.1% 360.7 635.3 49 12/10 322.48 -14.5% 243.85 -18.6% 78.63 1.5% 24.4% 624.8 535.6 48 12/3 229.49 -23.3% 173.97 -27.5% 55.52 -6.2% 24.2% 282.0 496.0 47 11/26 388.67 -12.4% 300.39 -16.5% 88.28 5.0% 22.7% 194.5 185.3 46 11/19 166.84 -14.3% 127.57 -18.0% 39.27 0.5% 23.5% 41.6 359.0 45 11/12 183.17 2.5% 128.95 -12.0% 54.22 68.3% 29.6% 422.9 251.3 44 11/5 167.53 -16.8% 117.59 -22.8% 49.94 2.0% 29.8% 335.6 414.9 43 10/29 147.15 11.2% 96.66 -11.3% 50.49 115.6% 33.6% 204.5 108.7 42 10/22 156.94 9.5% 95.94 -17.1% 61.00 120.8% 38.9% 370.0 56.0 41 10/15 152.92 -2.4% 106.50 -14.1% 46.42 42.2% 30.4% 343.3 233.0 40 10/8 183.79 9.3% 109.87 -9.4% 73.92 57.7% 40.2% 248.6 257.6 Q3 DEG 1742.79 -4.0% 1320.93 -14.7% 421.86 58.0% 24.2% Q3 HMM 1667.09 -4.9% 1298.39 -13.9% 368.70 49.9% 22.1% 1806.3 1609.5 39 10/1 152.58 -14.3% 109.97 -20.4% 42.61 7.1% 27.9% 352.1 382.7 38 9/24 153.60 5.0% 108.69 -12.5% 44.91 103.6% 29.2% 169.3 112.5 37 9/17 164.69 14.0% 107.37 -14.2% 57.32 197.2% 34.8% 190.8 165.2 36 9/10 128.84 0.0% 102.29 -10.5% 26.55 82.9% 20.6% 189.3 60.3 35 9/3 119.04 -9.5% 100.87 -13.7% 18.17 23.5% 15.3% 65.6 95.1 34 8/27 109.34 -13.1% 91.74 -16.6% 17.60 11.5% 16.1% 12.6 45.3 33 8/20 124.53 -4.4% 101.11 -12.8% 23.42 63.3% 18.8% 100.8 81.2 32 8/13 122.13 -1.8% 98.44 -9.5% 23.69 51.8% 19.4% 118.0 143.9 31 8/6 139.66 1.4% 111.78 -3.6% 27.88 27.9% 20.0% 189.8 133.5 30 7/30 108.78 -18.3% 89.06 -20.2% 19.72 -8.7% 18.1% 56.8 177.2 29 7/23 120.50 -1.9% 97.25 -9.4% 23.25 49.9% 19.3% 88.3 72.7 28 7/16 118.09 -4.8% 94.88 -13.5% 23.21 61.7% 19.7% 267.8 94.7 27 7/9 105.31 -16.7% 84.94 -22.7% 20.37 22.9% 19.3% 5.1 45.2 Q2 DEG 1831 -15.0% 1434 -18.8% 397 9.4% 21.7% Q2 HMM 1791.55 -12.2% 1402.94 -16.7% 388.61 9.1% 21.7% 2314.8 2422.0 26 7/2 127.11 -12.3% 96.32 -21.6% 30.79 39.4% 24.2% 102.3 181.4 25 6/25 123.25 -7.7% 98.18 -12.8% 25.07 20.1% 20.3% 205.4 85.8 24 6/18 149.89 -11.2% 114.68 -17.7% 35.21 19.5% 23.5% 208.2 142.8 23 6/11 130.81 -13.6% 103.23 -18.6% 27.58 12.3% 21.1% 305.0 152.6 22 6/4 118.16 -34.1% 96.17 -32.8% 21.99 -39.1% 18.6% 15.8 386.8 21 5/28 113.83 -16.6% 91.37 -22.9% 22.46 24.9% 19.7% 154.4 87.9 20 5/21 111.98 -15.2% 91.84 -18.9% 20.14 7.2% 18.0% 99.8 185.7 19 5/14 111.02 -23.6% 90.00 -26.8% 21.02 -6.2% 18.9% 155.6 113.6 18 5/7 122.05 -25.2% 99.74 -29.5% 22.31 -7.7% 18.3% 141.5 106.1 17 4/30 106.99 -40.6% 86.94 -39.6% 20.05 -44.5% 18.7% 0.0 120.5 16 4/23 217.30 -8.3% 171.47 -0.3% 45.83 -29.4% 21.1% 187.5 841.3 15 4/16 184.50 48.7% 134.40 24.8% 50.10 205.3% 27.2% 314.8 8.1 14 4/9 174.66 21.6% 128.60 5.9% 46.06 107.5% 26.5% 424.5 9.4 Q1 DEG 2068 -20.0% 1661 -25.0% 407 10.0% 19.7% Q1 HMM 2020.45 -23.2% 1626.20 -28.4% 394.25 9.4% 19.5% 2116.5 2857.2 13 4/2 192.11 -36.0% 144.16 -44.6% 47.95 20.1% 25.0% 300.9 461.1 12 3/26 135.54 -49.8% 110.21 -50.9% 25.33 -44.1% 18.7% 218.0 335.6 11 3/19 138.72 -46.5% 112.58 -49.6% 26.14 -27.1% 18.8% 154.2 534.3 10 3/12 146.96 -24.4% 116.11 -30.8% 30.85 16.5% 21.0% 177.0 247.2 9 3/5 174.59 -7.2% 132.93 -15.4% 41.66 34.1% 23.9% 112.3 258.8 8 2/26 160.96 4.5% 130.35 -2.5% 30.61 50.7% 19.0% 258.0 74.9 7 2/19 172.68 -8.1% 143.99 -12.7% 28.69 25.0% 16.6% 86.2 80.1 6 2/12 172.00 -19.4% 145.34 -23.1% 26.66 8.9% 15.5% 224.0 211.0 5 2/5 158.26 -16.7% 131.08 -20.8% 27.18 11.1% 17.2% 23.0 114.6 4 1/29 151.21 -14.6% 122.05 -20.9% 29.16 27.6% 19.3% 201.2 151.6 3 1/22 131.62 -16.3% 107.98 -21.0% 23.64 14.8% 18.0% 60.7 61.0 2 1/15 135.49 -17.3% 108.51 -23.9% 26.98 27.0% 19.9% 143.3 137.8 1 1/8 150.31 -14.1% 120.91 -19.5% 29.40 18.6% 19.6% 157.7 189.2 OD = optical disc (DVD + Blu-ray) YoY = year over year percentage change TBO = total box office BD = Blu-ray
__________________
RIP Kosty. Last edited by bruceames; 02-21-2012 at 08:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1652 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,749
|
It is nice to see DVD down only single digits, and to see OD only down a few percentage. I am not sure if that is sustainable, but I am guessing no one at the studios is complaining.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1653 | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 15,372
|
Quote:
__________________
RIP Kosty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1654 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
Wouldn't it be something if BD growth tracked BO strength 1:1 (or close to it) for 2012? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1655 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 15,372
|
I would hope it does better than 1:1, as that would be zero growth basically. Last year it was 1.19:0.92 (19.4% growth with BO down 8.2%) or, 1.3:1 adjusted for box office parity. I'm guessing we'll see between 1.1:1 to 1.15:1 revenue / box office this year, but right now it's not quite there yet. 1.276:1.265 --> 1.009:1, or, slightly less than 1 percent higher than the 1:1 base.
__________________
RIP Kosty. Last edited by bruceames; 02-21-2012 at 08:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1656 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 509
|
Any EST sales #'s?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1657 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
And most of the strong (non blockbuster) titles from Q1 to date should be released in Q3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1658 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1659 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
2) It's not just "three companies". It's every company that sells movies. They merely gave those three as examples. 3) "Not every CE company is involved"? True. NEC doesn't sell movies. But Apple does. MS does. Sony does. Vudu is on tons of TVs and bluray players. So is Cinemanow. 19M movies sold all year to millions of iPads, 360s and PS3s isn't good. Last edited by bombsnizzle; 02-22-2012 at 01:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1660 | ||
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 879
|
Interesting factoid in a UV article this morning...Tom Adams:
Quote:
U.S. DVD unit sales dropped in '07 Quote:
__________________
Warner Bros, on Ultraviolet - "We recognize that the product is not perfect today,” Mr. Tsujihara said. “We don’t have the luxury of waiting a year until we have everything perfect.” |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#1661 | ||
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
From 2010: Quote:
It's not hard to see what has happened. Why buy any movie (digital or on disc) when you can rent it for $1.xx on average?? Once again, DVD from 1997-2004/5 did not have to face such a proposition. Last edited by bombsnizzle; 02-22-2012 at 01:58 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#1662 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
Again, it makes statements like "Blu-ray has maintained sell through" look absolutely ludicrous. Sell through (new and catalog) has taken a beating from OD sell through peak. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1663 | |||
|
Home Theater Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,064
|
Quote:
I think you are being confused as one figure for 2011 being just movies while the 2007 figure is all disc sales including all other releases in addition to movies. One quote is movie only sales to compare physical movie sales with the scale of UV movie sales. The other quote is talking about movies and TV shows etc. Apples and oranges. Quote:
Quote:
I think its apple to oranges and the total OD disc sales have actually declined less than the revenue decline for OD. DVD unit sales have not declined as fast or as much as DVD revenues as the retail price points for old DVD catalog releases have dropped since 2007. Last edited by Kosty; 02-22-2012 at 02:09 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#1664 | |
|
Home Theater Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,064
|
Quote:
Far more DVD and Blu-ray unit sales of all types of releases were sold in 2011 which would be the proper figure to use against the 2007 number. The 2011 figure above I think is just movies to make the point against the use of UV to put it into perspective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1665 |
|
Home Theater Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,064
|
No one is arguing that total revenues or disc sales in 2011 for DVD and Blu-ray is equal to DVD at its peak in 2007 or before for either catalog or new releases.
But much if not most of the decline is concentrated in the revenues generated from DVD catalog non new release sales which Blu-ray has not covered DVDs attrition as much as it has for new release revenues and units. But 2011 or 2012 is not and will never be what DVD was in at its peak in 2007 or above in any regard. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|