![]() |
|
|||||||
The High Definition Lounge Can't find a proper forum for your questions, comments, reviews, etc.? Post them here! ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 10,611
|
It was suggested this sticky be put under this title with a link to the Bars, Bars and More Bars post.
As an often asked question because once a widescreen TV is brought home, many people wonder why there are black bars top and bottom or on the left and right sides of the TV screen. These posts and essays delve into this subject. Here is that link: Bars, Bars and More Bars An updated version is here: Bars, Bars and More Bars Also check out: HDTV Pictures DVD Pictures |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 365
|
Because different source materials are shot in many different aspect ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Defender of Sanity
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,626
|
Why do HD-DVD and BD movies still have bars on the top and bottom? Did they start using 20:9 ratio right after I bought a 16:9 TV?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 10,611
|
Most movies on any type DVDs are originally shot in 1.85:1 which will result in small bars on the top and bottom of the 1.78:1 HDTV screen. Other widescreen film aspect ratios will result in larger bars. For more information see: DVD Pictures
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Sony KD34XS955
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pointe-Claire QC
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
Almost all movies today are filmed with aspect ratios of 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 (2.39:1 and 2.40:1 are exhibition variants only). Both of these aspect ratios have been in common use since the 1950's. (It is not something new and it is unlikely to change as far as film is concerned). Both are wider than 16:9 (=1.78:1). 2.35:1 movies will always show bars and only fill about 3/4 of the height of the 16:9 screen. A 1.85:1 movie only fills the screen of most 16:9 TVs because of the overscan built ito the TV. Without the overscan, 1.85:1 movies will also display black bars, albeit very narrow ones. On older movies you will find many other aspect ratios used, some as high as 2.76:1 (MGM Camera 65/ Ultra Panavision 70). It is a common misconception that the 16:9 aspect ratio was chosen for TV to match that of movies. It wasn't. It was chosen for technical reasons related to TV broadcasting and data compression requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Very Grizzled Vet of 1 yr
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,764
|
Don't forget the "theater" factor. It used to be that most of the revenue came from theatrical presentation, so it was the major (at the time) distribution channel that had a big say in Hollywood going "wider."
Obviously that is no longer true. Still, I'm pretty convinced that some movies are being released on DVD cropped to 16:9... War of the World's comes to mind. Academy standard in theaters as I recall, 16:9 on DVD and in HD cable broadcast. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
FRONTLINE ENT.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
don't confuse me....i just figured out after a week of owning it that anything in 2.34 plays with bars on top and bottom... you either got it backwards or my tv is backwards cuz aspect ratio of 1.72 and 1.85 fill my screen entirely (going HDMI) without having to adjust anything... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Sony KD34XS955
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pointe-Claire QC
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
On a 16:9 TV with no overscan, 1.85:1 movies will exhibit thin black bars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Very Grizzled Vet of 1 yr
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,764
|
Which is exactly why I HAD to have piano black bezels... and watch only at night in a pitch black room. Only if I actually look for it can I see the bars. Like I've said countless times, the human eye is one hell of an instrument. Focus yourself on what is going on in the movie and issues around the periphery tend to recede into the background.
I figure those complaining about the bars are just bored with what they are watching! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Defender of Sanity
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,626
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
FRONTLINE ENT.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Sony KD34XS955
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pointe-Claire QC
Posts: 1,989
|
Yes, that is a valid assumption. Almost all TVs have overscan built in. However, on a 16:9 monitor with no overscan a 1.85:1 movie will only fill 96% of the height of the screen, so the two bars will total 4% of the screen's height.
Last edited by BrianO; 07-24-2007 at 05:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 10,611
|
And I would add that all TVs have overscan built in unless there is a menu method of getting rid of it. Unfortunately the broadcasters are still sending video noise at the edges of some video so the TVs still need to overscan. When I watch NBC late night there is a green vertical line on the left side of the screen unless I turn the overscan back on. But with it on the picture is not as clear because of the scaling used to add the overscan. So I just watch it with the green line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
IMAX - Think Big
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 57
Posts: 20,892
|
Quote:
__________________
In the Kingdom of the blind . . . . a one eyed man is King. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 10,611
|
No this is on my 1080p LCD panel so the only way to get any overscan is to scale the incoming signal. On my CRT based display, I just live with the overscan because it does not impact the picture quality and once I started adjusting the height and width, the geometry started to go to crap, so I hit a decent overscan, fixed the geometry, re-converged and called it a day. I haven't been back into the service menu since.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|