![]() |
|
|||||||
HD DVD Players HD DVD Players ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
TimeWarnerStinks
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 210
|
Sony knows the killing point of Blu-ray is the media cost, and if you believe their propaganda, the cost is supposed to be close to a DVD..."in time", whatever the heck that means. DVD media was over $9 a piece when it debuted, and it took 4 years for it to drop down to $1. I know the Sony and Panasonic Blu-ray recorders are selling in Japan already, but it's very hard to find a definite, current price on the media. I've seen recent articles mention prices for a blank from $20-$30US. Here are some nice HD media picks though.
http://www.blu-ray.com/media/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Mr. Wizard
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ferndale, Michigan
Age: 61
Posts: 5,981
|
When you compare cost per MB of storage, media of 10x size should cost 10x price. But only after volume manufacturing kicks in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
A couch and an HDTV to go please.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13
|
...it is about being able to sell enough units to make them commercially viable, particularly the media.
Whether the studios charge you $75/movie or $25/movie (just to be extreme) isn't going to matter as much as how many units they sell. In real terms, in a case like that, you don't sell 1/3 of the volume at triple the price...you might sell a 1/5th. That is the heart of the economics here, and it is the thing that will hold the development back. It is why I feel HD-DVD will win. Early adopters are NOT enough of a market. Think about how much money we have all spent already and how very little content there is for us to watch. There simply are not enough of us yet to be a commercially interesting market. What is the ratio at this point? 10x the number of SD channels as HD channels? And not every HD TV owner will spring for an HD/Blu-Ray DVD player. Upconverting DVD players will be "good enough" for a lot of people. I am not really making my point as concisely as I meant to but we are really talking about mass market products that have a very small audience at this point. Content won't be developed to pursue a small number of customers, and studios have had years to figure out what DVD pricing works. They will know that higher price means fewer sales and ultimate less profit. Time will fix it of course, but price...price is absolutely everything in this market. NO ONE would pay as much per unit as a studio would want to make to begin to approach the profit they can make on standard DVD's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
HD Fan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 1,023
|
I use a somewhat "flawed" logic to justify buying DVDs instead of renting. This logic says that if I watch the movie more than once, I am better off buying instead of renting. The fact that I don't have to mess with renting & returning a DVD also factors into the buy choice.
Assuming that the movie is $18 with tax (like the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory I bought today at Best Buy), I really would have to watch the movie about 4 times to justify buying over renting. If the price of a basic high def DVD is much higher, than I will probably continue buying standard DVDs or rent. I have noticed that Best Buy, Circuit City & Comp USA all have the same DVD release price (which goes up a week later). Why are all the prices about the same? Competition. If they priced the release at $25 or so before tax, I (and millions of other shoppers) would just rent the movie or wait for the price to drop after a few years. Best Buy now puts Gladiator (an awesome movie) on for $8 on special. I cannot believe that the movie industry is going to sacrifice the sale of DVDs - they certainly cannot depend upon strictly on ticket sales at the movie theater for their income - that has been a declining market for years. To make this work, they have to come in somewhat near the current standard DVD price, with possibly a small increase for all the "extras" that will be included in the HD version. Finally, I have a DVD+R burner in my PC. When I first started buying blank DVDs they were around $3 each. Last time I looked, I could get them on sale for under 50 cents each. I expect the same thing to happen with high def DVDs, regardless of which standard wins out. All of this is speculation. We really don't know who will win the war (if anyone), or if the high def DVD market will ever be more than just a niche. A lot of that will depend upon disk availability and pricing. It is going to be fun to see how all of this sorts itself out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 632
|
HDTV - $3000
Home Theater Setup - $1000 DVR - $650 High Def DVD player - $500 Too cheap to spend $30 on a High Def DVD (compared to $18 for a regular DVD)? I highly doubt it. I also expect High Def DVD's to be the most fantastic demo of your TV's abilities. Once you see a movie on a High Def DVD, I think HDTV owners would have a hard time buying regular DVDs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
HD Fan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 1,023
|
Add the cost of a new reciever (to handle the new HD sound capablilities) to the mix for $1,000 to $1,500, and you are probably right - a $30 high def DVD will not be a problem.
Cable started out at $15 and people screamed about paying that. Now I pay $120 + for HD cable / cable internet and don't think twice about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
High Definition is the definition of life.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,211
|
Quote:
Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Crabtree's Bludgeon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by maicaw; 11-24-2005 at 12:03 AM. |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
| ||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|