High Def Forum - Your High Definition Community & High Definition Resource

Go Back   High Def Forum - Your High Definition Community & High Definition Resource > High Definition Viewing Mediums, HDTVs > Flat-Panel TVs
Rules HDTV Forum Gallery LINK TO US! RSS - High Def Forum AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button Groups

Flat-Panel TVs Plasma, LCD RSS - Flat-Panel TVs

Getting a new 32" LCD

Reply
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2008, 04:57 PM   #16
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Alright thanks for the info i still need to pick between the LG Sharp and the Sammy. Maybe even the Vizio.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 08:06 PM   #17
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PFC5 View Post
As I posted in another thread, it depends on HOW they measure it. Some measure the most accurate way, and some measure with the method that provides the lowest number for the spec.
So who measures accurately? Or the most accurately between Sharp, Sammy, and LG?
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 12:20 PM   #18
Super Moderator
 
PFC5's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 28,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth27 View Post
So who measures accurately? Or the most accurately between Sharp, Sammy, and LG?
Who knows for sure. You have to look at the fine print for any model in the specs or call them to know for sure which method they use.

This is the problem with non-standardized specs for these TVs. I can almost bet that the really low quoted specs are using the method that is not as accurate, Gray to Gray, to measure it, but i wouldn't know other than a 4ms and lower seems fishy to me.
__________________
Denon AVR-887
Klipsch RP-5 Pwred Towers (mains) (525 watts peak each 12"Subs)
All Klipsch RC-25(ctr),(2)SS1(surr),(2)SS1(rearSurr)
Toshiba (2)HD-A20,PS3,BD35
For SACD/DVD-A Samsung HD-841
Panny 50pz80u plasma
SETTINGS
RCA HD50LPW162 50"DLP w/HD2+
SA 3250HD
47" LCD+Yamaha5790+HD-A1(bedroom)
Harmony 680 + (2) 670s (amazing remote/support)
Game room with Onkyo receiver & B&W Speakers
The_Cable_Game
Take the high ground and be happier
PFC5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 04:20 PM   #19
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PFC5 View Post
Who knows for sure. You have to look at the fine print for any model in the specs or call them to know for sure which method they use.

This is the problem with non-standardized specs for these TVs. I can almost bet that the really low quoted specs are using the method that is not as accurate, Gray to Gray, to measure it, but i wouldn't know other than a 4ms and lower seems fishy to me.
So would you think a LG 32" with 4ms response is not accurate?

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....ustomerreviews

i found a better price on this TV btw for like 700 bucks.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 04:26 PM   #20
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

and what is the accurate way to measure it and the inaccurate way?
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 04:37 PM   #21
Super Moderator
 
PFC5's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 28,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth27 View Post
So would you think a LG 32" with 4ms response is not accurate?

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....ustomerreviews

i found a better price on this TV btw for like 700 bucks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth27 View Post
and what is the accurate way to measure it and the inaccurate way?
I said previously that measuring the time from black to white to black again is slower so it should be compared to other displays that use the same method. Ditto if they use gray to white to gray as the method to measure it.

You must compare apples to apples or know you are not comparing like measured displays. Which is more accurate? Since all things in a moving picture CAN have black in it, I would think that black to white to black is more representative of real world use myself.

You will have to research HOW LG measures that spec and then compare to other displays that measure with the same method to know which is faster.

It really is too bad there cannot be standards required for the mfg to follow here, but AFAIK there is not.

EDIT:

This is WHY you cannot just accept the specs on retailers web sites:

http://us.lge.com/products/model/detail/tv|audio|video_lcd%20flat%20panel__32LG70.jhtml

Under the specs tab for this display at the mfg site it says the response rate is 6.5ms and they say it is using G to G which is gray to white to gray. Using that method means it is overstating the speed based on my reasoning earlier in this post.

You need to check the mfg site for your model number you are interested in to find HOW they measure response times and what it truly is.
__________________
Denon AVR-887
Klipsch RP-5 Pwred Towers (mains) (525 watts peak each 12"Subs)
All Klipsch RC-25(ctr),(2)SS1(surr),(2)SS1(rearSurr)
Toshiba (2)HD-A20,PS3,BD35
For SACD/DVD-A Samsung HD-841
Panny 50pz80u plasma
SETTINGS
RCA HD50LPW162 50"DLP w/HD2+
SA 3250HD
47" LCD+Yamaha5790+HD-A1(bedroom)
Harmony 680 + (2) 670s (amazing remote/support)
Game room with Onkyo receiver & B&W Speakers
The_Cable_Game
Take the high ground and be happier
PFC5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:59 PM   #22
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PFC5 View Post
I said previously that measuring the time from black to white to black again is slower so it should be compared to other displays that use the same method. Ditto if they use gray to white to gray as the method to measure it.

You must compare apples to apples or know you are not comparing like measured displays. Which is more accurate? Since all things in a moving picture CAN have black in it, I would think that black to white to black is more representative of real world use myself.

You will have to research HOW LG measures that spec and then compare to other displays that measure with the same method to know which is faster.

It really is too bad there cannot be standards required for the mfg to follow here, but AFAIK there is not.

EDIT:

This is WHY you cannot just accept the specs on retailers web sites:

http://us.lge.com/products/model/detail/tv|audio|video_lcd%20flat%20panel__32LG70.jhtml

Under the specs tab for this display at the mfg site it says the response rate is 6.5ms and they say it is using G to G which is gray to white to gray. Using that method means it is overstating the speed based on my reasoning earlier in this post.

You need to check the mfg site for your model number you are interested in to find HOW they measure response times and what it truly is.
Ah that clears things up thanks.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:20 PM   #23
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

yes they do need some sort of regulation on that. It is almost impossible to find out what the ms is just quickly on the internet.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:29 PM   #24
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Now i think im down to the Sammy and Sharp but i just dont know on them. The ms is killing me.

Sharp- http://www.sharpusa.com/products/Mod...,1964,00.html#

Sammy- http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/d...XZA&fullspec=F

or

http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/d...XZA&fullspec=F

Last edited by Stealth27; 12-08-2008 at 06:40 PM.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:29 PM   #25
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

I think i am leaning toward the sharp now.
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 11:32 PM   #26
What is HD?
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Hey, if you haven't made your purchase yet, consider the Toshiba Regza 32RV530U. I just picked one up for about $600. It's got nice specs and 1080p. Any opinions on this model from other folks?
glara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 11:38 PM   #27
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Thanks for the input but i think im going to go with the Sharp

http://www.sharpusa.com/products/Mod...,1964,00.html#
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 04:17 PM   #28
High Definition is the definition of life.
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Anyone have the Sharp Aquos LC-32GP3U and can comment on the performance of it?
Stealth27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Go Back   High Def Forum - Your High Definition Community & High Definition Resource > High Definition Viewing Mediums, HDTVs > Flat-Panel TVs
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Reply

Tags
aquos, lcd, samsung, sharp, xbox 360

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads to Getting a new 32" LCD
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
durability of Sharp LCDs JoeProcopio Flat-Panel TVs 16 11-05-2008 01:35 PM
Making the LCD plunge! 32" CRT to...? 32 - 37 LCD? andsoitgoes Flat-Panel TVs 6 06-12-2008 01:34 AM
Choices on 32" LCD Nathan52789 Flat-Panel TVs 0 06-06-2008 10:28 AM
Exchanged My 32" LCD For A 42" LCD Ward Cleaver Flat-Panel TVs 33 04-08-2007 09:59 PM
NEC LCD Technologies Develops Four New System-on-Glass LCD Modules eHDMI High Definition News & Informative Articles 0 10-21-2006 11:38 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2004 - 2008, High Def Forum