High Def Forum
Thank you for visiting. This is our website archive. Please visit our main website by clicking the logo above.

Klipsch Quintet III Speakers (Mounting?)

BiggNewt
10-20-2009, 03:46 PM
I'm thinking about getting this system and noticed the speakers come with stands attached. How can this be mounted to a wall? I currently have speakers attached to the wall with brackets that swivel. Can I use these?

patrickf0345
10-21-2009, 01:04 AM
I'm thinking about getting this system and noticed the speakers come with stands attached. How can this be mounted to a wall? I currently have speakers attached to the wall with brackets that swivel. Can I use these?

Yes the stands swivel they can be mounted to the wall or anywhere you would like them to be ..FYI the bottom of the stand has a metal plate that can be removed an used as a template makes mounting a breeze

BiggNewt
10-21-2009, 05:50 AM
Okay well that being cool and all, the only thing is I currently have two hole for each bracket as it is, wanting to avoid putting more holes in the wood paneling. Suppose it's a sacrifice I might have to make for better sound. Anyone have this set?

gamebred
10-21-2009, 09:18 PM
Okay well that being cool and all, the only thing is I currently have two hole for each bracket as it is, wanting to avoid putting more holes in the wood paneling. Suppose it's a sacrifice I might have to make for better sound. Anyone have this set?


I don't have the Quintet IIIs but i do have the Quintet SLs in the bedroom. After comparing them both, the SLs have a "fuller" sound due to the extra woofer. I found the Quintet IIIs to be too bright for my tastes. I paid the same for the SLs at Vanns as BB was charging for the III's. I don't know what your planning to pay for the IIIs, but it may be worth looking into the SLs if you go that route.

Honestly, if I were to do it all over again especially spending many nights with these speakers in my bedroom, I would have probably looked into the Energy line, as they have some deals going on for a small setup suitable for a bedroom. The entry level Klipsch speakers can be harsh at times, in my own experiences. You may disagree. I do like the sound of there reference line but I haven't lived with a pair yet. I've actually started looking into other lines that have a "warmer" feel to them. The best thing to do is actually listen to them for yourself ...preferably with your receiver of choice.

Hope this helps some.

patrickf0345
10-21-2009, 11:03 PM
Okay well that being cool and all, the only thing is I currently have two hole for each bracket as it is, wanting to avoid putting more holes in the wood paneling. Suppose it's a sacrifice I might have to make for better sound. Anyone have this set?

I have them in my den in a 7.3 system for them being a small satellite speakers the sound is very impressive pair them up with a good receiver and sub the sound is quite nice .I'm not sure if gamebred ment the Synergy line i've never heard of the energy line at klipsch but the Quintet III system is apart of the synergy line I also own the Klipsch synergy f-3 5.2 system in my living room so if you have any more questions i might be able to help .but in my opinion you should find a klipsch dealer in your area and demo them first before you buy the taste of sound differs from person to person

BiggNewt
10-22-2009, 07:46 AM
Okay, slight change of plan.

I might just a good center from Klipsch (I'm in desperate need of a center, I have HTIB one right now).

Which of the centers from Klipsch would best suit my speakers? They are 8ohms, 160W Max, with Wooden Enclosures.

Was checking out the RC-52, RC-25, RC-35, C-1, and RCX-4..I'm trying to stay under $200 if at all possible.

gamebred
10-22-2009, 08:23 AM
I'm not sure if gamebred ment the Synergy line i've never heard of the energy line at klipsch but the Quintet III system is apart of the synergy line I also own the Klipsch synergy f-3


No, I meant Energy speakers...a completely different brand of speakers with a completely different sound. ;) I'm just not a big fan of Klipsch's synergy line after spending some time with them. I just think you can do better for the price. Don't get me wrong, I do like Klipsch's reference series speakers but anything below that sounds too "tinny" for my liking.

BiggNewt, if you don't match your center to the rest of your speakers, you're going to be dissappointed. The idea is to match all speakers in a system so they perform seamlessly. Each brand of speaker has a different timbre and tone. It won't sound too good if you go mixing and matching different speakers....unless you can find similiar sounding speakers that share the same tone as one another, which is possible but more trouble than it's worth, IMO. Your best bet would be to purchase your mains and center at the same time. You could start with a 3.0 system, later on...add a sub and make it a 3.1 setup. You could always add the surrounds down the road.

eiger
10-22-2009, 10:54 AM
BiggNewt, if you don't match your center to the rest of your speakers, you're going to be dissappointed. The idea is to match all speakers in a system so they perform seamlessly. Each brand of speaker has a different timbre and tone. It won't sound too good if you go mixing and matching different speakers.....

This applies to L/C/R only for the most part. Mixing brands between front and back really yields no negative impact.

gamebred
10-22-2009, 02:04 PM
This applies to L/C/R only for the most part. Mixing brands between front and back really yields no negative impact.

I didn't see where the OP said anything about buying the Klipsch mains along with their center channel. This is why I reccomended buying the fronts and center at the same time. It seemed as though BigNewt was going to get a Klipsch center to pair with his/her HTIB... which wouldn't sound right. Actually, it would sound like sh*t. I know from firsthand experience what a Klipsch center channel sounds like with HTIB speakers, as I used my Klipsch SL speaker as a center for a week or so. The HTIB center sounded okay with the Klipsch fronts after some tweaking with crossover settings and treble on the receiver but it still doesn't sound as good as when matched correctly. It did take away that harshness from the dialog. I only did this for aesthetic reasons. The HTIB center fit in the empty top drawer of my chest of drawers perfectly. It was a small sacrifice for a bedroom setup that looks clean.

It would just be wiser to get a matching set of less expensive speakers than to have a nice center channel with inferior speakers, IMO.

junehhan
10-22-2009, 02:46 PM
Okay well that being cool and all, the only thing is I currently have two hole for each bracket as it is, wanting to avoid putting more holes in the wood paneling. Suppose it's a sacrifice I might have to make for better sound. Anyone have this set?


I think it is going to depend on how much money you are willing to spend. For the price of what the Quintet III speakers cost, I am not sure if you will find anything out there that sounds better. The sound quality is darn impressive for such small bookshelf speakers, and I am now considering buying another set to put in the living room since it is very small.

Nice bright sound, and even better if you pair it with a good subwoofer. I have mine paired to a Klipsch RSW 10.

BiggNewt
10-22-2009, 03:16 PM
I didn't see where the OP said anything about buying the Klipsch mains along with their center channel. This is why I reccomended buying the fronts and center at the same time. It seemed as though BigNewt was going to get a Klipsch center to pair with his/her HTIB... which wouldn't sound right. Actually, it would sound like sh*t. I know from firsthand experience what a Klipsch center channel sounds like with HTIB speakers, as I used my Klipsch SL speaker as a center for a week or so. The HTIB center sounded okay with the Klipsch fronts after some tweaking with crossover settings and treble on the receiver but it still doesn't sound as good as when matched correctly. It did take away that harshness from the dialog. I only did this for aesthetic reasons. The HTIB center fit in the empty top drawer of my chest of drawers perfectly. It was a small sacrifice for a bedroom setup that looks clean.

It would just be wiser to get a matching set of less expensive speakers than to have a nice center channel with inferior speakers, IMO.

Actually I already have some decent fronts, they are getting up there in age but they still put out some good quality. The only thing left in my sound system that is HTIB is the Surrounds and the Center. I do plan on going to all Klipsch at some point. Just NEED a center ASAP, and while looking at just centers I came across the Quintet III. So my dilemma is...should I get a good center from Klipsch and add fronts then surrounds later. Or get a decent speaker system all in one like the Quintet III and not have a good as center as I would get now?

gamebred
10-22-2009, 08:02 PM
Okay, I gotcha. ;) If your fronts are just temporary, I'd personally go with the RC-62. I would check e-bay as you might find a good deal on one. It is a good speaker for the price and it would pair nicely with some R5, R7s, RF 62s or 82s later on. It is the little brother of the RC64...which is one badassed center. In medium sized rooms, the RC62 is no slouch. It would make a nice first upgrade. Have you decided on which Klipsch fronts you are looking to upgrade to later?

Loves2Watch
10-22-2009, 10:26 PM
The center channel speaker in a surround sound system is the absolute most important speaker in the chain and must be tonally and timbre matched to the front speakers if things are to sound correct. If not you will have terrible problems with dialog and things sounding muddied.

I would suggest getting the quintet system to make sure your fronts (all 3) are matched.

BiggNewt
10-23-2009, 05:27 AM
I've been looking at the following C-2, RC-35, RC-52, RCX-4. The 64 seems to be out of my price range.

And in Systems Quintet III, HD 500 System and to throw a monkey wrench in the equation a few Polk systems and Inifinity systems...

Also looked at the QuintetSL, what is the big difference between that and the Quintet III, all I can see is a lower frequency response with the fronts.

And on the mounting with the Quintets, can I take the stands off and use the keyhole in the back to mount them to the stands I already have in place?

gamebred
10-23-2009, 08:39 AM
Also looked at the QuintetSL, what is the big difference between that and the Quintet III, all I can see is a lower frequency response with the fronts.




....and that's a good thing. I have mine crossed at 80hz instead of 100-120 that should be applied to the III's. If you like the brighter sound of the Quintet III's....go for it. Your sub will pull low feq. duty anyways.

As far as centers yeah, the RC64 will run you $750-1000. That's why I reccomended looking into the RC62 instead. Unless you had a big room and plenty of power, the RC64 would just be overkill. You should be able to find a RC62 anywhere from $250-$380. If that's more than you are willing to spend try looking into the RC52, another nice center channel. I only recommend this because you say you are looking to upgrade to all Klipsch later on but depending on how much later...an all in one setup such as the IIIs or the SLs, might suit your needs better.

BiggNewt
10-23-2009, 08:41 AM
What about the new HD-500, what's the lowdown on them? Are they better or worse than the Quintet III/SL? Specs seem to be a step down?

Which Energy models would you recommend?

gamebred
10-23-2009, 08:56 AM
What about the new HD-500, what's the lowdown on them? Are they better or worse than the Quintet III/SL? Specs seem to be a step down?

Which Energy models would you recommend?


I haven't listened to the HD-500, so I can't comment on those.

Here's a nice Energy package....http://cgi.ebay.com/Energy-C-50-C-C50-5-Speaker-Surround-PKG-Brand-NEW_W0QQitemZ330366881968QQcmdZViewItemQQptZSpeake rs_Subwoofers?hash=item4ceb6690b0

These aren't bad sounding speakers, either....http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENTAKE5PK

Loves2Watch
10-23-2009, 09:50 AM
What about the new HD-500, what's the lowdown on them? Are they better or worse than the Quintet III/SL? Specs seem to be a step down?

Which Energy models would you recommend?

The new HD 500 got a glowing review from a professional...and they do sound awesome. I would suggest them as an alternative to the other speaker systems you mentioned.

Review here - http://www.hometheatermag.com/compactspeakers/klipsch_hd_theater_500_speaker_system/

BiggNewt
10-24-2009, 08:59 AM
Went to Best Buy yesterday (not to purchase). Listened to the Klipsch Quintet III (new model) in their calibration set-up. I thought it sounded good especially the lows but I think the Klipsch Sub had something to do with that. I don't think they had the Center set up properly (most likely to dramatize the surround effect). I also heard the Definitive Tech Pro 1000 Center speaker in the Magnolia area. That was a very impressive center. Thoughts on it?

Loves2Watch
10-24-2009, 10:29 AM
Went to Best Buy yesterday (not to purchase). Listened to the Klipsch Quintet III (new model) in their calibration set-up. I thought it sounded good especially the lows but I think the Klipsch Sub had something to do with that. I don't think they had the Center set up properly (most likely to dramatize the surround effect). I also heard the Definitive Tech Pro 1000 Center speaker in the Magnolia area. That was a very impressive center. Thoughts on it?

Unless you match it with other Def Tech speakers it will be out of place. If you want an entire Def Tech system, they are very good...

BiggNewt
10-24-2009, 10:40 AM
It would be the same scenario, I would get that Center now then gradually upgrade to all Def Tech. I thought Def Tech was more high end so I was surprised to see that center for so cheap.

Loves2Watch
10-24-2009, 11:13 AM
I would still choose the HD 500 system...

BiggNewt
10-24-2009, 02:23 PM
CNet seemed to like the Energy set over the HD 500 or do you not go by them?

Loves2Watch
10-24-2009, 08:00 PM
CNet seemed to like the Energy set over the HD 500 or do you not go by them?

I have found CNet's ratings to be sometimes biased or at least not as critical as they should be (can you say advertising dollars). I tend to, and recommend that anyone shopping for new equipment read some A/V review magazines like Sound & Vision, Home Theater Magazine, The Perfect Vision, and the like as well as on line sources like Audio Video Revolution (http://www.avrev.com), Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity (http://www.hometheaterhifi.com) as examples.

I also do my own testing and reviewing as well as collaborate with other industry professionals.

Now on to the speakers - I like the Energy speakers but believe the Klipsch satellite system to be more versatile and with another sub added either now or in the future, a system to be dealt with by systems costing many times it's price.

BiggNewt
10-25-2009, 11:11 AM
I'm not a big fan of Sats in the front. So I'm not sure if I want to go the Quintet or HD500 route. Sorry If I'm being a pain. :lol:

I'm sorta thinking about getting a RC-25, RC-52 or C-2 now and then getting the F1 or R-15 fronts in a couple months. I'm worried about matching the center to the fronts so obviously the C-2 goes with the F1 and Reference series together. Are these quality fronts?

Loves2Watch
10-25-2009, 11:19 AM
Are these quality fronts?

Since they are not made by some no name company or Bose they would be just fie. Hearing is believing and sound is subjective. I do suggest that you audition the speakers prior to making a decision.

Please also note that the equipment you have the speakers connected to will also effect the way they sound.

BiggNewt
10-25-2009, 11:48 AM
I have an Onkyo 604, not the greatest but I think it's somewhat decent? Would that be enough to power the towers and center efficiently?

That's also another question, with my current receiver, would it even be advantageous to go after something like the reference line or stick with the F-1 or below models?

By the way do you have AIM, would make things slightly easier.

Loves2Watch
10-25-2009, 12:59 PM
I have an Onkyo 604, not the greatest but I think it's somewhat decent? Would that be enough to power the towers and center efficiently?

That's also another question, with my current receiver, would it even be advantageous to go after something like the reference line or stick with the F-1 or below models?

By the way do you have AIM, would make things slightly easier.

Nope, no AIM. I would suggest you look at brands other than Klpisch as they sound a bit too bright and harsh powered by an Onkyo receiver...that is all except for the HD 500 system.

BiggNewt
10-25-2009, 06:02 PM
Interesting. Why is that?

Because I could get these...

http://baltimore.craigslist.org/ele/1432953883.html

For $450 for the speakers and sub.

BiggNewt
10-26-2009, 08:07 AM
newegg.com has the Energy Take 5 Set for $150, think I should bite? I could also get the Energy Sub that goes with it off ebay for $130 or a Klipsch KSW10 for $160

gamebred
10-26-2009, 10:03 AM
I agree with LTW, the synergy line (F1, Quintets) does sound "bright" with Onkyo and Yamaha receivers. I would pair these speakers with H/K, Denon, Elite, or Marantz receivers, if i went that route. The smaller Energy Takes won't sound as warm as the other lines of Energy (C-series, RC series,etc.) but warmer than the Klipschs. It really just depends on what you like, as mentioned previously, sound is subjective. Me personally, have grown tired of my Klipsch SL's...they are too bright for my liking and they are paired with an HK receiver too. I don't see the F1 or even the F3s for that matter, being a speaker I would want to listen to everyday.

For the price of the Energy Takes...what do you have to lose? You could always use them for a smaller bedroom setup if you decide you want to start building a serious setup for your main listening area, later on down the road.

BiggNewt
10-26-2009, 04:07 PM
Are the C series much better? Because I could get C-50s for just a bit more than the Take 5 series.

gamebred
10-26-2009, 05:25 PM
Are the C series much better? Because I could get C-50s for just a bit more than the Take 5 series.

The C-50 would definately be a step up from the Takes. Energy offers some great sounding speakers at a reasonable price in general. Check out the price on this tower....http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENC300

These are the towers I should have got instead of the SL's. Match the C-300s with the a decent center channel and you got a great front soundstage.

It's always a good idea to take your time when hunting for speakers. I have changed my mind so much...not to mention my budget, that I've gone nearly insane. I've managed to narrow it down between the Energy RC-50s and the MA RS-6 or RX-6s. Too bad it'll have to wait til after the new year as I just scooped up a Pioneer 500M and an Elite SC-25. I figure a nice receiver was in order before the speakers..this way i'll have plenty of time to audition and make up my dayum mind. lol

Loves2Watch
10-26-2009, 05:44 PM
The C-50 would definately be a step up from the Takes. Energy offers some great sounding speakers at a reasonable price in general. Check out the price on this tower....http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENC300

These are the towers I should have got instead of the SL's. Match the C-300s with the a decent center channel and you got a great front soundstage.

It's always a good idea to take your time when hunting for speakers. I have changed my mind so much...not to mention my budget, that I've gone nearly insane. I've managed to narrow it down between the Energy RC-50s and the MA RS-6 or RX-6s. Too bad it'll have to wait til after the new year as I just scooped up a Pioneer 500M and an Elite SC-25. I figure a nice receiver was in order before the speakers..this way i'll have plenty of time to audition and make up my dayum mind. lol

Then you really should audition some Paradigm speakers. Once you hear them you will know why I say this.