Its been a peeve of mine, all my life, that by in large, television is a vast wasteland. 90% of the time, its very hard to find anything OTA worth watching, the addition of multicasts has perhaps reduced that to only 85% of the time. If I don't like the television offering and will not watch it because its junk and garbage, what difference does it make if its offered in HD or SD?
As it is, I can tell little difference between a OTA digital HD picture and a SD picture, except to note that both run rings around an OTA analog signal. And its the increased content variety of multicasts that has made the digital transition a positive experience for me. And since multicasts are fairly new, I expect more and more stations to take fuller advantage of multicasts in the future.
And to answer the question, no I do not use a converter box and a old analog TV incapable of delivering HD, both my TV sets can and do deliver HD.
__________________
High definition is not the definition of my life.
But knowledge is power and HD does have some potential to increase content variety and choices.
|