View Single Post
Old 11-20-2008, 07:03 AM   #35
Lee Stewart
Behold - the future!
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Age: 58
Posts: 25,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobY View Post
Yes, but my point was obviously they surveyed a very small segment of the HDTV market if the expressed preferred method of getting 3D was Blu-Ray. If you count every PS3 as a Blu-Ray player (and we all know only a fraction of PS3's are being used for BD movies on a regular basis based on disc sales), then there are around 8.5 Million BD players in use.

A lot of people, including NPD, say there are 40 Million US households with HDTV's. How could BD be the preferred method of 3D for HDTV owners when nearly 5 times as many HDTV owners don't have BD as compared to those who do?

I still see it as a gimmick and most consumers won't be bothered to wear glasses with cables hooked to a special 3DHDTV or a special 3DBD player, especially those who already wear glasses. Few movies were filmed in 3D, most 3D films were filmed in anaglyph 3D and I doubt the approach of digitally synthesizing a 3D image from a 2D film master will be anywhere near as successful as actual 3D filming.
Yes - the sample was small.

3D movies today are not filmed in the old anaglyph method. They are only presented that way on optical disc because there is no newer 3D system out yet.

As far as turning 2D movies into 3D and the number of 3D films?

Just go over to the At The Movies Forum - some threads I posted there might interest you.
Lee Stewart is offline   Reply With Quote