Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart
You have got to be kidding me!
Everyone one of those bullets is positive about 3D.
|
Obviously you like reading things the way you want to see it.
3-D product awareness: 75 percent of respondents have had a 3-D experience and 73 percent said that they would recommend 3-D to friends or family.
-So thats 75 percent who liked 3D in the current market. The current market being a few movies available in the theatre, and a large Imax experience may have a hand in that decision. That has nothing to say on how a mainstream strategy would succeed.
• 3-D opinions: 3-D is not a gimmick or fad for most surveyed. Both positive and negative opinions are provided; respondents describe 3-D as an image or experience with depth, which is realistic and lifelike. It is an immersive and improved way to experience a movie or game.
-This doesnt say anything about glasses. Now lets go to the next one.
• 3-D glasses: While glasses are a distraction, it was not enough to hinder consumers’ interest in a purchase. Several sub groups will pay more for a 3-D TV without glasses, but even a 3-D experience with glasses is something consumers are interested in for the home.
Quote:
-Already addressed this.
• 3-D movies and games: More than half of respondents agreed that 3-D makes movies and games more enjoyable, with gamers finding the 3-D experience slightly more enjoyable than the overall sample.
Back to point 1.
Quote:
|
You are confusing the way you watch movies today versus how you would watch a 3D movie. The idea (this seems to be lost on you BTW) is that by adding real depth to the image - you won't want to do all that other crap - all you will want to do is watch the movie. . . in the dark.
|
Glasses suck and they are a huge limitation to the adoption of a 3D standard.
Nothing youve said changes that.