View Single Post
Old 11-19-2008, 05:56 PM   #26
Lee Stewart
Behold - the future!
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Age: 58
Posts: 25,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnyDC View Post
So what we have hear is a difference in opinion since nothing in the OP backs up what you say. Just so you know that.
You have got to be kidding me!

Quote:
• 3-D product awareness: 75 percent of respondents have had a 3-D experience and 73 percent said that they would recommend 3-D to friends or family.
Quote:
• 3-D opinions: 3-D is not a gimmick or fad for most surveyed. Both positive and negative opinions are provided; respondents describe 3-D as an image or experience with depth, which is realistic and lifelike. It is an immersive and improved way to experience a movie or game.
Quote:
• 3-D glasses: While glasses are a distraction, it was not enough to hinder consumers’ interest in a purchase. Several sub groups will pay more for a 3-D TV without glasses, but even a 3-D experience with glasses is something consumers are interested in for the home.
Quote:
• 3-D movies and games: More than half of respondents agreed that 3-D makes movies and games more enjoyable, with gamers finding the 3-D experience slightly more enjoyable than the overall sample.
Everyone one of those bullets is positive about 3D.


Quote:
Now thats out of the way yes I do think its goofy and troublesome, especially if I was watching a movie passively(eating, having a conversation, cooking, browsing the internet at the same time)
Yes - it is FINALLY out of the way. I really hope that you read EACH bullet in it's entirety and not cherry pick the words that you want to.

You are confusing the way you watch movies today versus how you would watch a 3D movie. The idea (this seems to be lost on you BTW) is that by adding real depth to the image - you won't want to do all that other crap - all you will want to do is watch the movie. . . in the dark.
Lee Stewart is offline   Reply With Quote