Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart
It is cheaper to build a 1366x768 NR FPD than it is a 1920x1080 FPD.
Where did this exact resoution come from? Sony used it in their LCD projectors about 7-8 years ago. It was the highest resolution offered at the time over 1280x720.
This what you wanted or are you still dense?
|
Still dense, if you prefer to look at it that way.
Yes, of course, I would expect that any fool would know that "it is cheaper to build a 1366x768 NR FPD than it is to build a 1920x1080 FPD." But why build with a 1366 X 768 instead of using 1280 X 720: as I stated earlier the signal is feeding at 1280 X 720 so why not just use a 1280 X 720 NR display and avoid the scaling? Result: lower cost; higher PQ. Hard to conceive that 7% (768/720=1.07) higher resolution makes any sense especially since the final PQ is probably lost in scaling.
and Lee, if you're going to take another stab at this, please avoid any reference to 1920 as I intentionally left it out of the original question in (what now seems to have been a futile) attemt to avoide obfuscation.