High Def Forum - Your High Definition Community & High Definition Resource - View Single Post

bboncorr · 11-15-2006, 08:26 PM

so it lacks features, does not look as good visualy, and doesnt play as good but it got a higher score then the 360 version. i think they realized where catching on to the ps3 games all scoring higher and they gotta try to keep it fair. i guess we gotta read the review and not go by the scores anymore.

i really am baffled to why it got a higher score when they basicaly said the game feels lifeless and falls short of the 360 version visualy. what did they give the lasting appeal or sound a much higher score then the 360 version to even it out?

11-15-2006, 08:26 PM	#3
bboncorr High Definition is the definition of life. Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 4,418	so it lacks features, does not look as good visualy, and doesnt play as good but it got a higher score then the 360 version. i think they realized where catching on to the ps3 games all scoring higher and they gotta try to keep it fair. i guess we gotta read the review and not go by the scores anymore. i really am baffled to why it got a higher score when they basicaly said the game feels lifeless and falls short of the 360 version visualy. what did they give the lasting appeal or sound a much higher score then the 360 version to even it out? __________________ Living Room pioneer kuro plasma PDP-5010FD (9.9) Denon 4308CI (9.5) B&W 683's, HTM61, 685's (9.0) Sony PS3 (9.0) Sony BD-S350 (9.5) HSU VTF-3 MK3 sub (9.0) Harmony 1000 (9.5) XBOX360 + HD DVD (9.2) Nintendo Wii (7.5) Netflix Roku (9.0) Gaming Room 60A3000 (8.7) Halcro ssp200 (10. perfection) Deftech BP7004, C/L/R2002, BP2X (8.7) Sony Remote Commander (7.0) Toshiba HDA35 (7.9) Samsung 1400 (5.0) Bedroom Panasonic TH-42PZ85U (8.7) Tivo HD (9.7)