View Single Post
Old 08-24-2006, 03:59 PM   #8
paulc
Very Grizzled Vet of 1 yr
 
paulc's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,764
Default

They'd still be fat... the point I was trying to make was too subtle... we need MORE PIXELS on the screen. Nobody, but nobody here ever mentions pixel density... and that plays as a factor in display quality as well. Take you "standard" 17" computer monitor and run it at 640 x 480... fat pixels!
paulc is offline   Reply With Quote